GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 16.2 points higher (33.7 vs 17.5) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 17.5 | −48.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 48.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $145.77 | −93.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 93.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.10s | 24.76s | −17.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 17.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 48.1% less intelligence, 93.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GLM-5.2 (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill