GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)

Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.

Clear winner

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Max)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 33.70
Total cost: $2097

MetaMuse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 45.10
Total cost: $1655

Verdict

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)

Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 33.8% more intelligence, 21.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.2% slower end-to-end.

Metric	GLM-5.2 (Max)	Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	33.7	45.1	+33.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 33.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$2,097.29	$1,655.27	−21.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 21.1% cheaper
End-to-end time (lower is better)	28.14s	30.45s	+8.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 8.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$1.40 / $4.40	$1.25 / $4.25
Input modalities	Text	Text, Image, Video

Open this matchup in the interactive picker GLM-5.2 (Max): what beats it Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.

GLM-5.2 (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill