GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 25.9 points higher (33.7 vs 7.8) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 7.8 | −76.9% Solar Pro 3 is 76.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $159.22 | −92.4% Solar Pro 3 is 92.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.25s | 18.89s | −35.4% Solar Pro 3 is 35.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 76.9% less intelligence, 92.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
GLM-5.2 (Max)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill