GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 3.9 points higher (41.8 vs 37.9) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick GLM-5.3-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 37.9 | −9.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $109.55 | −64.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 64.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 49.53s | +25.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 25.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 9.3% less intelligence, 64.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.3-FlashMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill