GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 34.8 points higher (41.8 vs 7.0) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick GLM-5.3-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.2.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 7.0 | −83.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 83.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $121.78 | −60.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 60.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 38.89s | 12.54s | −67.8% Mistral Small 3.2 is 67.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 83.3% less intelligence, 60.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GLM-5.3-FlashMistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill