GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
Qwen3.8 Max vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 3.8% less intelligence, 938.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 40.2 | −3.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 3.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $3,172.37 | +938.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 62.83s | +59.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 59.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GLM-5.3-FlashQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill