GLM-5.3 (Low) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 15.8 points higher (34.3 vs 18.5) but costs 53× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $19.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 18.5 | −46.1% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 46.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $19.16 | −98.1% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 98.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.49s | 5.09s | −82.7% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 82.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 46.1% less intelligence, 98.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GLM-5.3 (Low)GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill