GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 12.0 points higher (46.3 vs 34.3) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1013; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and GLM-5.3 (Low) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 46.3 | +35.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 35.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $3,880.88 | +283.3% Grok 4.7 (High) is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.40s | 30.44s | −3.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 3.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 35.0% more intelligence, 283.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill