GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 8.5 points higher (34.3 vs 25.8) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $993; both premium class). Pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 25.8 | −24.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 24.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $992.88 | −1.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 1.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.21s | 46.75s | +49.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 49.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 24.8% less intelligence, 1.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill