GLM-5.3 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 10.5% more intelligence, 89.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 37.9 | +10.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $109.55 | −89.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 89.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.21s | 49.53s | +58.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 58.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.3 (Low)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill