GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 47.6% more intelligence, 92.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.1 | 34.1 | +47.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 47.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.55 | $95.73 | −92.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 92.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.68s | 9.48s | −71.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 71.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill