GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 13.8 points higher (48.1 vs 34.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1013; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.3 (Low).
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 48.1 | +40.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 40.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $2,000.35 | +97.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 97.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.40s | 67.10s | +113.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 113.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 40.2% more intelligence, 97.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 113.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill