GLM-5.3 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Max) scores 11.1 points higher (44.8 vs 33.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2503 vs $1737; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GLM-5.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh).
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 33.7 | −24.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 24.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,503.48 | $1,737.18 | −30.6% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 30.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.79s | 20.40s | −29.1% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 29.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.3 (Max): 24.8% less intelligence, 30.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.3 (Max)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill