GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 2.3 points higher (24.1 vs 21.8) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 21.8 | −9.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 9.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $61.93 | −95.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 95.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.99s | 46.61s | −57.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 57.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 9.5% less intelligence, 95.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill