GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 65.1% more intelligence, 76.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 39.8 | +65.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 65.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $362.72 | −76.2% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 76.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.99s | 50.49s | −53.7% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 53.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill