GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 16.1 points higher (40.2 vs 24.1) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $1524; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 40.2 | +66.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 66.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $3,172.37 | +108.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.99s | 62.87s | −42.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 42.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 66.8% more intelligence, 108.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill