GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 25.7% more intelligence, 79.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 30.3 | +25.7% Beam 1.0 is 25.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $318.73 | −79.1% Beam 1.0 is 79.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.72s | 8.02s | −93.1% Beam 1.0 is 93.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill