GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 55.1% more intelligence, 67.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 32.1 | +55.1% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 55.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $108.15 | −67.3% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 67.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.70s | 16.69s | −84.2% GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is 84.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-5-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-5-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill