GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) scores 13.5 points higher (34.2 vs 20.7) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($768 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 34.2 | +65.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 65.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $767.78 | +131.8% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.70s | 6.58s | −93.8% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 93.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 65.2% more intelligence, 131.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)GPT-5.6 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-5-6-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-5-6-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill