GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 27.1 points higher (47.8 vs 20.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $331; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 47.8 | +130.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $361.37 | +9.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 9.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.29s | 14.35s | −73.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 73.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 130.9% more intelligence, 9.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-6-1-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-6-1-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill