GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 22.2% more intelligence, 54.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 25.3 | +22.2% Hy3 is 22.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $149.61 | −54.8% Hy3 is 54.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.29s | 33.29s | −37.5% Hy3 is 37.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill