GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) scores 15.9 points higher (20.7 vs 4.8) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($331 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 4.8 | −76.8% Ministral 3 3B is 76.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $12.23 | −96.3% Ministral 3 3B is 96.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 108.97s | 3.13s | −97.1% Ministral 3 3B is 97.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 76.8% less intelligence, 96.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill