GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 17.7 points higher (38.4 vs 20.7) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 20.7, and GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when 20.7 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 38.4 | +85.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 85.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $1,607.86 | +385.4% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 4.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.29s | 27.12s | −49.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 49.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 85.5% more intelligence, 385.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill