GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
20.70
Total cost
$331
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.716.6−19.8% Step 3.5 Flash is 19.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$331.24Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)53.29s20.68s−61.2% Step 3.5 Flash is 61.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $1.25$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill