GPT-5.5 (High) vs Mercury 2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Mercury 2.5 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 24.7 points higher (37.0 vs 12.3) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $218; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 12.3, and Mercury 2.5 when 12.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Mercury 2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 12.3 | −66.8% Mercury 2.5 is 66.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $218.11 | −93.6% Mercury 2.5 is 93.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.56s | 4.18s | −78.6% Mercury 2.5 is 78.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Mercury 2.5 vs GPT-5.5 (High): 66.8% less intelligence, 93.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Mercury 2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.5 (High)Mercury 2.5Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill