GPT-5.5 (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (high) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (high) scores 32.0 points higher (53.1 vs 21.1) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1719 vs $247; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (high) when you need intelligence above 21.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 21.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.1 | 21.1 | −60.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,719.16 | $247.26 | −85.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 85.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.48s | 6.61s | −73.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.5 (high): 60.3% less intelligence, 85.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) scores 57.70 for $1543.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
GPT-5.5 (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill