GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) scores 4.2 points higher (26.0 vs 21.8) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($987 vs $66.1; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 21.8 | −16.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 16.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $986.85 | $66.09 | −93.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 93.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.68s | 67.11s | +302.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 302.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026): 16.2% less intelligence, 93.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 302.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill