GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 3.5 points higher (29.5 vs 26.0) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1965 vs $987; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 29.5 | +13.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 13.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $986.85 | $1,964.83 | +99.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 99.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.68s | 16.58s | −0.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 0.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026): 13.5% more intelligence, 99.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.5 Instant (June 2026)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-instant-06-26/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill