GPT-5.5 (Medium) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Medium) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Medium) scores 0.9 points higher (33.8 vs 32.9) but costs 44× as much to run the benchmark ($2095 vs $47.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 32.9, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 32.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Medium) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.8 | 32.9 | −2.7% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 2.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,095.12 | $47.85 | −97.7% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 97.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.73s | 12.43s | +27.7% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 27.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs GPT-5.5 (Medium): 2.7% less intelligence, 97.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 27.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5.5 (Medium)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-medium/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill