GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) scores 33.6 points higher (38.4 vs 4.8) but costs 433× as much to run the benchmark ($5294 vs $12.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 4.8 | −87.5% Ministral 3 3B is 87.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,294.36 | $12.23 | −99.8% Ministral 3 3B is 99.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 74.88s | 3.06s | −95.9% Ministral 3 3B is 95.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GPT-5.5 (Xhigh): 87.5% less intelligence, 99.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill