GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 18.8 points higher (50.9 vs 32.1) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $108; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 32.1, and GPT-5.6 Luna (High) when 32.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 50.9 | +58.6% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 58.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $2,925.01 | +2604.6% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 27× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.69s | 70.19s | +320.6% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 320.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (High) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 58.6% more intelligence, 2604.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 320.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)GPT-6 Astra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill