GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Luna (High) scores 26.1 points higher (32.1 vs 6.0) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($108 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 14B.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 6.0 | −81.3% Ministral 3 14B is 81.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $37.56 | −65.3% Ministral 3 14B is 65.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.69s | 7.89s | −52.7% Ministral 3 14B is 52.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 81.3% less intelligence, 65.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill