GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 60.1% less intelligence, 1119.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 12.8 | −60.1% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 60.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $1,318.62 | +1119.3% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.30s | 17.13s | +5.1% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 5.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill