GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs Step 5 Preview
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Step 5 Preview by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Step 5 Preview scores 11.6 points higher (43.7 vs 32.1) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $108; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Step 5 Preview when you need intelligence above 32.1, and GPT-5.6 Luna (High) when 32.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Step 5 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 43.7 | +36.1% Step 5 Preview is 36.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $1,190.26 | +1000.6% Step 5 Preview is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.03s | 12.08s | +9.5% Step 5 Preview is 9.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Step 5 Preview vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 36.1% more intelligence, 1000.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Step 5 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Step 5 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/step-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/step-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill