GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 4.8 points higher (25.8 vs 21.0) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $27.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 21.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) when 21.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.0 | 25.8 | +22.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 22.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.02 | $992.88 | +3574.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 37× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.73s | 46.45s | +710.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 710.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low): 22.9% more intelligence, 3574.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 710.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill