GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 0.2 points higher (25.2 vs 25.0) but costs 9.7× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $44.3; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 25.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) when 25.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 25.2 | +0.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 0.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $44.32 | $427.73 | +865.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 9.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.19s | 46.03s | +643.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 643.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium): 0.8% more intelligence, 865.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 643.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill