GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 9.8 points higher (25.3 vs 15.5) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $23.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Hy3 when you need intelligence above 15.5, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 15.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.5 | 25.3 | +63.2% Hy3 is 63.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22.97 | $149.61 | +551.3% Hy3 is 6.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.97s | 33.69s | +577.9% Hy3 is 577.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 63.2% more intelligence, 551.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 577.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill