GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Mercury 2
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mercury 2 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Mercury 2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 30.3% less intelligence, 356.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Mercury 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.5 | 10.8 | −30.3% Mercury 2 is 30.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $22.97 | $104.94 | +356.9% Mercury 2 is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.98s | 6.54s | +31.3% Mercury 2 is 31.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Mercury 2Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill