GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)
Kimi K3 (Low) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh): 13.0% less intelligence, 563.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 30.1 | −13.0% Kimi K3 (Low) is 13.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $179.33 | $1,190.42 | +563.8% Kimi K3 (Low) is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.80s | 49.38s | +7.8% Kimi K3 (Low) is 7.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 41.30 for $175.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill