GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh): 73.4% less intelligence, 125.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 9.2 | −73.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $179.33 | $405.10 | +125.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.87s | 6.13s | −82.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 82.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill