GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max): 32.4% less intelligence, 33.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.3 | 25.2 | −32.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 32.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $319.93 | $427.73 | +33.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 33.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.47s | 46.03s | −56.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 56.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill