GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 45.1% less intelligence, 47.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 673.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 18.4 | −45.1% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 45.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $940.97 | +47.7% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 47.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.52s | 65.86s | +673.0% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 673.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill