GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) scores 3.2 points higher (33.5 vs 30.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $319; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Beam 1.0.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 30.3 | −9.6% Beam 1.0 is 9.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $318.73 | −50.0% Beam 1.0 is 50.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.17s | 8.02s | −1.8% Beam 1.0 is 1.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 9.6% less intelligence, 50.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill