GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash scores 1.9 points higher (41.1 vs 39.2) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1015 vs $997; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.2 | 41.1 | +4.8% Ling 3.1 Flash is 4.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $997.39 | $1,014.56 | +1.7% Ling 3.1 Flash is 1.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.59s | 13.64s | +28.8% Ling 3.1 Flash is 28.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium): 4.8% more intelligence, 1.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)Ling 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill