GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) scores 14.0 points higher (39.2 vs 25.2) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($997 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.2 | 25.2 | −35.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 35.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $997.39 | $427.73 | −57.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 57.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.88s | 47.00s | +332.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 332.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium): 35.7% less intelligence, 57.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 332.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-medium/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill