GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 25.6 points higher (47.0 vs 21.4) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $1145; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 21.4, and Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) when 21.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.0 | 21.4 | −54.5% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 54.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,464.84 | $1,145.36 | −66.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 66.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 113.85s | 111.40s | −2.2% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 2.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max): 54.5% less intelligence, 66.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill