GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) scores 23.1 points higher (30.1 vs 7.0) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($447 vs $122; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 7.0 | −76.7% Mistral Small 3.2 is 76.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $446.53 | $121.78 | −72.7% Mistral Small 3.2 is 72.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.06s | 9.99s | +64.9% Mistral Small 3.2 is 64.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium): 76.7% less intelligence, 72.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-medium/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill