GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 21.6% more intelligence, 41.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 554.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 25.3 | +21.6% Hy3 is 21.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $149.61 | −41.5% Hy3 is 41.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.09s | 33.29s | +554.0% Hy3 is 554.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill