GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) scores 13.7 points higher (20.8 vs 7.1) but costs 9.2× as much to run the benchmark ($256 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 7.1 | −65.9% Mistral Small 3.1 is 65.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $27.82 | −89.1% Mistral Small 3.1 is 89.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 10.74s | +110.6% Mistral Small 3.1 is 110.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 65.9% less intelligence, 89.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 110.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill