GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) scores 13.8 points higher (20.8 vs 7.0) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($256 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.2.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.8 | 7.0 | −66.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 66.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $255.77 | $121.78 | −52.4% Mistral Small 3.2 is 52.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.10s | 9.82s | +92.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 92.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning): 66.3% less intelligence, 52.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill